{
 "paper": "bouyeure-2026-fear-rsa",
 "adjudicated": "2026-09-11",
 "by": "supplied:runs/bouyeure-2026-fear-rsa/adjudication.answer.json",
 "note": "Verdicts for spans the mechanical match could not resolve. covered = a claim does account for it; gap = a real hole; not-an-assertion = the span states no result of its own. Every verdict carries `sha`, the fingerprint of the sentence it judged. A `gap` also carries `tree`, the fingerprint of which claims existed when it was judged, and a `covered` carries `claim_sha`, the wording of the claim it named — because a gap is a statement about the tree, and closing one is exactly the edit that used to leave the verdict standing over nothing. `coverage` discards a verdict whose fingerprints no longer match rather than applying a judgement nobody made about what is there now.",
 "spans": [
  {
   "uid": "results-029",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A bare panel label naming what the panel shows.",
   "sha": "035ebd46"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-043",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "Narration of which contrast was run first; the result follows in the next sentences.",
   "sha": "68e35602"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-054",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "item-stability-persists-test-phases",
   "why": "The claim states exactly these two effects: higher CS+- than CS++ item stability in middle temporal cortex at test_new, and higher CS++ than CS-- in inferior temporal cortex at test_old.",
   "sha": "a0fb0342",
   "claim_sha": "7c963862"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-080",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "Narration of which comparisons were made next, with no result.",
   "sha": "08e4edef"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-082",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A panel label defining how the context-specificity measure is computed, not a finding.",
   "sha": "bb870f9d"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-085",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A panel label defining how the reinstatement and context-specificity measures are computed, not a finding.",
   "sha": "a1b7f3b9"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-087",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "context-specificity-predicts-acquisition-reinstatement-regional-dissociation",
   "why": "The claim carries this same regional dissociation: reversal context specificity predicts generalized reinstatement favouring CS+- in ACC/SFG and CS-+ in precuneus.",
   "sha": "fe8fb80c",
   "claim_sha": "1d3c2057"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-096",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "Narration of how the subject-wise context-specificity values were extracted, with no result.",
   "sha": "9272326d"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-099",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "Narration of the LME model specification, with no result.",
   "sha": "2bf26433"
  }
 ]
}