{
 "paper": "rozak-2026-neurovascular-dl",
 "adjudicated": "2026-09-11",
 "by": "supplied:runs/rozak-2026-neurovascular-dl/adjudication.answer.json",
 "note": "Verdicts for spans the mechanical match could not resolve. covered = a claim does account for it; gap = a real hole; not-an-assertion = the span states no result of its own. Every verdict carries `sha`, the fingerprint of the sentence it judged. A `gap` also carries `tree`, the fingerprint of which claims existed when it was judged, and a `covered` carries `claim_sha`, the wording of the claim it named — because a gap is a statement about the tree, and closing one is exactly the edit that used to leave the verdict standing over nothing. `coverage` discards a verdict whose fingerprints no longer match rather than applying a judgement nobody made about what is there now.",
 "spans": [
  {
   "uid": "results-010",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "novas3d-outperforms-ilastik",
   "why": "These are the segmentation metrics on which the claim asserts the deep-learning pipeline beats the ilastik baseline for both channels.",
   "sha": "ce79aded",
   "claim_sha": "b075a399"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-014",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A description of how the displayed raw images were prepared for visualisation, not a result.",
   "sha": "ca459cd2"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-017",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A statement of how the ground-truth masks were produced - dataset preparation rather than a finding.",
   "sha": "8bc89fe7"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-018",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A bare panel label naming which model produced the displayed masks.",
   "sha": "789333cc"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-019",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A bare panel label naming which model produced the displayed masks.",
   "sha": "1f63868e"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-020",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A bare panel label naming which model produced the displayed masks.",
   "sha": "4a408204"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-029",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "radius-estimation-r2-0p68",
   "why": "This is the R-squared of 0.68 against simulated radii across more than 100,000 simulations that the claim states.",
   "sha": "f408b219",
   "claim_sha": "6c7f9242"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-032",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "An illustrative cross-section showing the method's detected boundary on one example capillary, not a reported result.",
   "sha": "e9e17c23"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-034",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "radius-estimation-r2-0p68",
   "why": "The claim that the estimator recovers known simulated radii is what this correspondence plot displays.",
   "sha": "8eb0f985",
   "claim_sha": "6c7f9242"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-035",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "An illustrative cross-section showing the method's detected boundary on one example capillary, not a reported result.",
   "sha": "61a7b5d4"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-037",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "radius-estimation-r2-0p68",
   "why": "The claim's assertion that the estimate stays stable under added Gaussian noise is exactly what this panel shows.",
   "sha": "5b23492d",
   "claim_sha": "6c7f9242"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-043",
   "verdict": "gap",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "No claim covers the microsphere phantom validation - that averaging more orthogonal planes and spokes converges the diameter estimate onto the manufacturer's 7.32 um specification; the radius claim rests on simulations only.",
   "sha": "54175fa6",
   "tree": "518d9a43"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-044",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A bare table title.",
   "sha": "c644b58f"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-049",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "baseline-intra-vessel-radius-varies-24pct",
   "why": "The claim about baseline variability in vessel radius accounts for this display of per-segment baseline standard deviations.",
   "sha": "31e76704",
   "claim_sha": "f8534936"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-051",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "vessel-radius-heterogeneity-stimulation",
   "why": "The claim that radius adjustments during stimulation vary within vessels accounts for this segment-wise and vertex-wise comparison.",
   "sha": "423d6eeb",
   "claim_sha": "58e01cc1"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-052",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "dilations-nearer-neurons-than-constrictions",
   "why": "The claim relates the direction of the radius change to distance from the nearest labelled pyramidal neuron, which is the relation shown here.",
   "sha": "8b07612f",
   "claim_sha": "aecfb536"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-057",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A bare table title.",
   "sha": "4a698552"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-059",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "baseline-intra-vessel-radius-varies-24pct",
   "why": "The claim about baseline variability in vessel radius is the quantity this table panel tabulates.",
   "sha": "b9ea6caf",
   "claim_sha": "f8534936"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-060",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "vessel-radius-heterogeneity-stimulation",
   "why": "The stimulation-evoked radius changes tabulated here are the ones the claim quantifies.",
   "sha": "5caf258c",
   "claim_sha": "58e01cc1"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-061",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "vessel-radius-heterogeneity-stimulation",
   "why": "Within-vessel heterogeneity of the radius change is precisely what the claim asserts.",
   "sha": "80309f9f",
   "claim_sha": "58e01cc1"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-062",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "dilations-nearer-neurons-than-constrictions",
   "why": "The claim states the vertex-to-nearest-neuron distances for dilating and constricting vessels that this panel tabulates.",
   "sha": "e60f9123",
   "claim_sha": "aecfb536"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-067",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "artery-dilates-venule-unchanged-at-low-power",
   "why": "The claim reports the radius responses of the sample artery, capillary and venule whose before-and-after centreline profiles this panel shows.",
   "sha": "ce13bb87",
   "claim_sha": "b8e6bc99"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-068",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "artery-dilates-venule-unchanged-at-low-power",
   "why": "These vertex-wise changes for the three sample vessels are the responses the claim quantifies.",
   "sha": "df9059ba",
   "claim_sha": "b8e6bc99"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-069",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A bare panel label with no text.",
   "sha": "e4b1c778"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-074",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A pure cross-reference to Table 3.",
   "sha": "114f7a19"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-081",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A bare table title, which restates the responder threshold rather than reporting a result.",
   "sha": "e1ab6c7b"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-084",
   "verdict": "gap",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "The control claim compares only dilation magnitudes between blue and green light; the distribution of constriction magnitudes shown alongside them is stated by no claim.",
   "sha": "8c546b48",
   "tree": "518d9a43"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-085",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "dilations-nearer-neurons-than-constrictions",
   "why": "The claim states how capillary radius changes are distributed relative to the closest pyramidal neurons, which is what this panel displays.",
   "sha": "c61b0b32",
   "claim_sha": "aecfb536"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-087",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "constrictions-deeper-than-dilations",
   "why": "The claim asserts that constrictors sit deeper and dilators nearer the surface, exactly the tendency this panel reports.",
   "sha": "650b2397",
   "claim_sha": "5a8b09df"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-094",
   "verdict": "gap",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "The tree's light-control claim covers dilations only; the constriction magnitudes under 458 nm and their excess over the 552 nm control are reported by no claim.",
   "sha": "a320790a",
   "tree": "518d9a43"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-102",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "An illustrative rendering of one image stack's vascular graph, showing the representation rather than asserting a finding.",
   "sha": "c3f65749"
  },
  {
   "uid": "results-108",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "capillary-efficiency-increases-4pct",
   "why": "The claim that capillary network efficiency rises during stimulation is this significant increase over the green-light control.",
   "sha": "cb2d63bf",
   "claim_sha": "bd339257"
  },
  {
   "uid": "captions-003",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A description of the microscope's emission path and filters - instrument setup, not a finding.",
   "sha": "7c41dff4"
  },
  {
   "uid": "captions-061",
   "verdict": "covered",
   "claim": "capillary-efficiency-increases-4pct",
   "why": "The claim that capillary network efficiency rises during stimulation is this significant increase over the green-light control.",
   "sha": "cb2d63bf",
   "claim_sha": "bd339257"
  },
  {
   "uid": "tables-001",
   "verdict": "not-an-assertion",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "A bare table title.",
   "sha": "c644b58f"
  },
  {
   "uid": "tables-002",
   "verdict": "gap",
   "claim": null,
   "why": "These rows are the only place the phantom accuracy figures appear - the bead diameter estimate tightening from 7.54 plus or minus 0.68 um to 7.34 plus or minus 0.32 um as averaging increases - and no claim states them.",
   "sha": "c36e0983",
   "tree": "518d9a43"
  }
 ]
}