Replication
step · paper openDeclaration a736d33bdd51 has not been accepted by anyone. · no paper read under it
Has an independent study found the same thing?
Mechanical: re-runnable from its declared inputs.
Part of Measures — What can be measured over the tree - its coverage, its wording, whether its code re-runs?
How it works
Nothing runs here, and the layer is declared so that the absence is a column rather than an omission. The replicates relation is defined in the schema and used zero times: no claim in this corpus has been checked against an independent study.
It is a different question from verification, answered by different evidence. Verification re-runs the authors' own code on their own data and can tell you the record matches the run. Only replication can tell you the finding holds.
Rests on
- claim-tree · step
Feeds
Nothing — this is a leaf.
Across the corpus
10 not run·a paper links to its own cell, where this layer's output for it is rendered
Inputs and outputs
- Views
-
- table — declared, and this layer produces nothing yet
- comparison — on the cell page, two versions aligned by the matcher, wherever the ledger holds more than one