Edge review

step · open

Declaration 81cb6ec4cb48 has not been accepted by anyone. · no paper read under it

What does a claim added after induction depend on and support?

Mechanical: re-runnable from its declared inputs.

How it works

How to run it, in the reference

Rests on

Feeds

Nothing — this is a leaf.

How it is defined

A model answers this layer, so the prompt is the layer. It is reproduced below from the committed file, and it is a declared input — editing it makes every run that used it stale.

extract/prompts/edge-inference.mdthe prompt it runs undernot in the repository

The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.

extract/prompts/contract/vocabulary.mdthe prompt it runs undernot in the repository

The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.

scripts/edge_review.pythe script that runs itnot in the repository

The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.

What it produces6 edges

One paper, as the worked example — Gadeke, v1. Read from runs/gadeke-2026-guilt-insula/edge-review.output.json · 3 KB. reviewed_on 2026-09-12model supplied:runs/gadeke-2026-guilt-insula/edge-review.answer.json

# sourcetargetrelationwhy
1 social-vs-partner-roi-risky-safe-coefficients only-precuneus-tpj-showed-positive part-of Claim 68 is the Social-vs-Partner half of the decision-phase Risky-Safe ROI regression (Appendix 1-table 6, span tables-019) whose two comparisons claim 45 states as one whole when it says only precun…
2 social-vs-solo-roi-risky-safe-coefficients only-precuneus-tpj-showed-positive part-of Claim 69 is the Social-vs-Solo half of the same decision-phase Risky-Safe ROI regression (Appendix 1-table 5, span tables-016), the second of the two comparisons claim 45 states together.
3 risk-aversion-parameter-not-differ-between participants-slightly-more-risk-averse validates The null difference in rho between gain and loss trials is the control that justifies pooling across them, and claim 54's Social-vs-Solo comparison of rho is computed on those pooled estimates.
4 left-ifg-insula-connectivity-subthreshold connectivity-between-guilt-responsibility-related-outcome-ph tests The subthreshold left IFG cluster from the insula-seeded gPPI (span results-143) is a further result of the seed-to-voxel analysis claim 14 predicts would show a Condition-by-Choice interaction in pre…
5 among-computational-models-fitted-momentary responsibility-redux-model-incorporating-expected part-of The AIC row of the happiness-model comparison is one measure of the Responsibility Redux model's fit that claim 63 states as a whole when it says the model predicted momentary happiness well.
6 participants-own-reward-prediction-errors partner-reward-prediction-errors-resulting qualifies Claim 55 asserts that the partner's prediction errors arising from the participant's own choices contribute to happiness; claim 51 bounds that contribution by showing the participant's own prediction …

Across the corpus

8 not run · 2 stale·a paper links to its own cell, where this layer's output for it is rendered

Inputs and outputs

Reads, besides its dependencies
Produces
  • runs/{paper}/edge-review.output.json
Views
  • table — rendered above, over the 6 edges in the artifact

Running it

The command comes from the declaration, so this text and what actually runs cannot diverge. pipeline.py run also runs the unmet dependencies first.

python3 scripts/pipeline.py run <paper> edge-review

Underneath, that runs python3 scripts/edge_review.py {paper} --answer runs/{paper}/edge-review.answer.json.