Gap claims

candidate · open

Declaration f01fc74ed619 has not been accepted by anyone. · 2 of 10 papers read under it

What claim would close each gap?

One of several parallel outputs, kept rather than collapsed — agreement between them is the informative case.

Part of Measures — What can be measured over the tree - its coverage, its wording, whether its code re-runs?

How it works

How to run it, in the reference

Rests on

Feeds

Nothing — this is a leaf.

How it is defined

A model answers this layer, so the prompt is the layer. It is reproduced below from the committed file, and it is a declared input — editing it makes every run that used it stale.

extract/prompts/gap-claim.mdthe prompt it runs undernot in the repository

The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.

scripts/gap_claims.pythe script that runs itnot in the repository

The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.

What it produces5 candidates

One paper, as the worked example — Gadeke, v3. Read from runs/gadeke-2026-guilt-insula/gap-claim.output.json · 5 KB. drafted_on 2026-09-12model supplied:runs/gadeke-2026-guilt-insula/gap-claim.answer.v3.json

# uidspanslugclaimrolepanelwhy
1 results-143 A smaller cluster in the left IFG showed the same effect but did not survive correction for multiple tests (p uncorrected = 0.001, T = 4.08, Z = 3.97, 38 voxels, peak at MNI [−38 –2 26]). left-ifg-insula-connectivity-subthreshold A cluster in the left inferior frontal gyrus showed the same insula-seed connectivity effect as the right IFG (highest for Risky-self / Safe-both choices) but did not survive correction for multiple c… empirical fig5 The tree records the surviving right-IFG insula-connectivity cluster (connectivity-between-left-anterior-insula) but nowhere the parallel left-IFG cluster with the same effect that fell below the corr…
2 tables-016 VStria L MPFC Precun TPJ L (Intercept) 0.67*** –0.03 0.38*** 0.07 (0.11) (0.10) (0.11) (0.09) socialVsSolo –0.47*** –0.10*** 0.30*** 0.24*** (0.03) (0.01) (0.02) (0.03) run –0.03* - –0.24*** –0.14*** … decision-phase-risky-safe-social-solo-per-roi In the decision phase, the Risky−Safe response difference between Social and Solo conditions yielded significant per-ROI linear-mixed-model coefficients in left ventral striatum, mPFC, precuneus and l… empirical app1table5 The tree carries the summary that only precuneus and TPJ showed positive Risky−Safe differences, but this appendix table is the only place the per-ROI Social-vs-Solo coefficients themselves are report…
3 tables-019 VStria L MPFC Precun TPJ L (Intercept) 0.61*** –0.03 0.38*** 0.07 (0.11) (0.10) (0.11) (0.09) socialVsPartner –0.07*** 0.23*** 0.39*** 0.07** (0.01) (0.01) (0.02) (0.03) run - - –0.24*** –0.14*** (0.0… decision-phase-risky-safe-social-partner-per-roi In the decision phase, the Risky−Safe response difference between Social and Partner conditions yielded significant per-ROI linear-mixed-model coefficients in left ventral striatum, mPFC, precuneus an… empirical app1table6 As with the Social-vs-Solo comparison, this appendix table is the only place the per-ROI Social-vs-Partner decision-phase coefficients are reported, beyond the precuneus/TPJ summary.
4 tables-031 The results for the response to low lottery outcomes were: InsulaL InsulaR MidTempR (Intercept) 0.70*** 0.95*** 1.22*** (0.18) (0.18) (0.18) Social 0.41*** 0.18*** –0.12** (0.01) (0.01) (0.04) R 2 (or… right-middle-temporal-tracks-low-partner-outcome-guilt The right middle temporal cortex responded more to low lottery outcomes for the partner in the Social than the Partner condition (Appendix 1—table 9), alongside the insulae. empirical app1table9 The tree records the insula guilt response but no claim carries the right middle-temporal region that met the same Social>Partner low-outcome criterion.
5 tables-032 The results of the models fitted to the response difference (response to Low lottery outcomes minus response to High lottery outcomes ) were: InsulaL InsulaR MidTempR (Intercept) –0.30 –0.07 –0.48* (0… right-middle-temporal-low-minus-high-social-partner The right middle temporal cortex showed a larger low-minus-high lottery-outcome response difference in the Social than the Partner condition (Appendix 1—table 10). empirical app1table10 The low-minus-high guilt contrast is claimed for the insulae but not for the right middle-temporal cortex, which this table row is the only place to report.

Across the corpus

8 not run · 2 stale·a paper links to its own cell, where this layer's output for it is rendered

Inputs and outputs

Reads, besides its dependencies
Produces
  • runs/{paper}/gap-claim.output.json
Views
  • table — rendered above, over the 5 candidates in the artifact

Running it

The command comes from the declaration, so this text and what actually runs cannot diverge. pipeline.py run also runs the unmet dependencies first.

python3 scripts/pipeline.py run <paper> gap-claim

Underneath, that runs python3 scripts/gap_claims.py {paper} --answer runs/{paper}/gap-claim.answer.json.