Gap claims
stale · v1 provisional approved v1 by Zach MainenWhat claim would close each gap?
for Feedback of peripheral saccade targets to early foveal cortex · this layer across all papers · json
Provisional
This layer needs a corpus-scope decision that has not been ruled on yet, so what it produces would change if the decision changed. It waits on claim-format, relation-vocab.
Approved
v1 read and approved by Zach Mainen on 2026-09-12. 1 of 2 drafts accepted into the tree, 1 rejected
Out of date
A file these inputs match appeared or was removed after this ran — the set is not what it was:
- claims/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/*.md
What it produced2 candidates
Read from runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/gap-claim.output.json · 3 KB. drafted_on 2026-09-11model supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/gap-claim.answer.json
| # | uid | span | slug | claim | role | panel | why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | results-077 | In contrast, we found no significant association between peripheral decoding and any of the ROIs (FEF: t(27) = 0.49, p =1.0; IPS: t(27) = 1.35, p =0.56; LO: t(27) = 2.43, p =0.07). | peripheral-decoding-unrelated-to-roi-activation | In the control condition (direct foveal stimulation), peripheral decoding is not significantly associated with activation in any of the three eye-movement ROIs (FEF: t(27)=0.49, p=1.0; IPS: t(27)=1.35… | control | fig4s1 | The tree records every ROI effect in the parametric modulation that reached significance but nothing about the peripheral-decoding side of the same analysis, so the control-condition dissociation on w… |
| 2 | results-078 | These findings confirm that our main effects were not simply explained by global brain fluctuations or signal-to-noise ratio, since under those conditions, we would have expected a similar relationshi… | parametric-effects-not-global-fluctuations | The absence of any association between peripheral decoding and ROI activation in the control condition, where foveal decoding is associated with all three ROIs, excludes global brain fluctuations and … | interpretation | fig4s1 | The tree carries the parametric modulation results and the caveat that they were exploratory, but not the inference the authors draw from the control condition - that the divergent foveal/peripheral p… |
How it is defined
A model answers this layer, so the prompt is the layer. It is reproduced below from the committed file, and it is a declared input — editing it makes every run that used it stale.
The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.
The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.
Artifacts
Versions
From the run ledger. There is no changelog beside it to keep in step.
-
v1 · 2026-09-11 · supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/gap-claim.answer.json
first run of the layer; drafts answered by Claude Opus 5 through --dump-prompt
python3 scripts/gap_claims.py kammer-2026-foveal-feedback --answer runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/gap-claim.answer.json
This layer across the corpus
Across the corpus
8 not run · 2 stale·a paper links to its own cell, where this layer's output for it is rendered
| Paper | State | Version | Last run | Output | Cell |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A three-dimensional immunofluorescence atlas of the … | not run | — | — | — | json |
| Distinct representational properties of cues and con… | not run | — | — | — | json |
| Computational modelling identifies key determinants … | not run | — | — | — | json |
| Contributions of insula and superior temporal sulcus…gap-claim re-run post-stance (#96) | stale | v3 | 2026-09-12 | gap-claim.output.json | json |
| Spatially targeted inhibitory rhythms differentially… | not run | — | — | — | json |
| Feedback of peripheral saccade targets to early fove…first run of the layer; drafts answered by Claude Opus 5 through --dump-prompt | stale | v1 | 2026-09-11 | gap-claim.output.json | json |
| iGABASnFR2 is an improved genetically encoded protei… | not run | — | — | — | json |
| A deep learning pipeline for mapping in situ network… | not run | — | — | — | json |
| Self-association enhances early attentional selectio… | not run | — | — | — | json |
| Impaired excitability of fast-spiking neurons in a n… | not run | — | — | — | json |
Inputs and outputs
- Reads, besides its dependencies
-
- extract/prompts/gap-claim.md · declared, and not in the repository — it hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale
- scripts/gap_claims.py · declared, and not in the repository — it hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale
- Produces
-
- runs/{paper}/gap-claim.output.json
- Views
-
- table — rendered above, over the 5 candidates in the artifact
Running it
The command comes from the declaration, so this text and what actually runs cannot
diverge. pipeline.py run also runs the unmet dependencies first.
python3 scripts/pipeline.py run <paper> gap-claim
Underneath, that runs python3 scripts/gap_claims.py {paper} --answer runs/{paper}/gap-claim.answer.json.