Plain wording
stale · v2 provisional awaiting approvalWhat does each claim say, in one sentence a non-specialist can read?
for Feedback of peripheral saccade targets to early foveal cortex · this layer across all papers · json
Provisional
This layer needs a corpus-scope decision that has not been ruled on yet, so what it produces would change if the decision changed. It waits on claim-format, relation-vocab.
Awaiting approval
Waiting for approval. That is a statement about the record, not about whether anyone has read this: people read the corpus without stamping what they read, and only a stamp leaves a trace. Approval is an operation on a version, not a step of its own — it is recorded against the version it was granted to, so running this layer again does not carry it forward.
What it produced24 claims
Read from site/src/data/plain-claims/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback.json · 6 KB. model supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.jsonprompt extract/prompts/plain-claim.md
-
A classifier trained on foveal V1 during feedback still identifies the same images when they are shown directly at the fovea.
slug cross-decoding-experimental-to-controlrole empiricalpanel fig2B
-
Feedback into foveal V1 carries the shape of the saccade target but not its semantic category.
slug decoding-shape-sensitive-not-semanticrole synthesispanel fig3
-
Frontal eye fields and lateral occipital cortex trend the expected way but fail correction, leaving IPS as the only region that holds.
slug fef-lo-nonsignificant-after-correctionrole controlpanel fig4B
-
The saccade target is decoded far less accurately from foveal feedback than from direct stimulation of the fovea by the same image.
slug foveal-feedback-below-direct-stimulationrole empiricalpanel fig2A
-
Which peripheral target a person is about to look at can be decoded from foveal V1, even though the target vanishes before fixation.
slug foveal-v1-decodes-peripheral-saccade-targetrole empiricalpanel fig2A
-
Foveal feedback to early visual cortex carries the target's shape, not its semantic category.
slug hypothesis-feedback-carries-shape-not-categoryrole hypothesispanel hypothesis
-
Foveal V1's information about peripheral targets is genuine top-down feedback, not leakage from large peripheral receptive fields.
slug hypothesis-feedback-not-spilloverrole hypothesispanel hypothesis
-
Foveal feedback during saccade preparation uses the same population code in V1 as an image shown directly at the fovea.
slug hypothesis-shared-representational-formatrole hypothesispanel hypothesis
-
Williams and colleagues found that foveal V1 carries information about peripheral stimuli, which others attribute to receptive-field spillover.
slug interprets-williams-2008-peripheral-spilloverrole literature-contextpanel hypothesis (spillover alternative), fig2B (U-shape test)
-
Intraparietal sulcus activity tracks foveal decoding more closely than peripheral decoding, making it a candidate source of the feedback.
slug ips-candidate-driver-foveal-feedbackrole synthesispanel fig4B
-
When the image is shown directly at the fovea, intraparietal sulcus activity tracks foveal decoding in the opposite direction.
slug ips-foveal-effect-reverses-in-controlrole controlpanel fig4-figure-supplement-1
-
In lateral occipital cortex the pattern reverses: decoding across shape falls while decoding across semantic category holds up.
slug lo-shows-reversed-specificityrole empiricalpanel fig3B
-
Peripheral decoding was unrelated to activity in all three regions where foveal decoding was related to each, ruling out global fluctuations and signal quality.
slug parametric-effects-not-global-fluctuationsrole interpretationpanel fig4s1
-
The analysis linking intraparietal, frontal eye field and lateral occipital activity to foveal decoding was exploratory, not preregistered.
slug parametric-modulation-exploratory-not-preregisteredrole scopepanel methods
-
A classifier trained on foveal V1 during feedback should still identify the same images shown directly at the fovea.
slug prediction-cross-decoding-generalizesrole predictionpanel hypothesis
-
Lateral occipital cortex should show the opposite profile to foveal V1, losing shape decoding while keeping category decoding.
slug prediction-lo-inverse-patternrole predictionpanel hypothesis
-
Decoding accuracy across early visual cortex should dip at parafoveal eccentricities and rise again at the fovea, not decay steadily.
slug prediction-u-shape-eccentricityrole predictionpanel hypothesis
-
In foveal V1, decoding across semantic category should fall under feedback while decoding across shape should hold up.
slug prediction-v1-category-drops-shape-preservedrole predictionpanel hypothesis
-
The decoding pipeline, regions of interest and statistical tests were all specified in advance in a preregistered plan.
slug preregistered-design-validates-mvparole methodologicalpanel methods
-
The preregistration reached OSF only after the manuscript was submitted, so its timing rests on website timestamps the authors cite.
slug preregistration-submitted-after-manuscriptrole scopepanel methods
-
The gaze-contingent display kept the peripheral target out of the central fovea on all but a fraction of a percent of saccades.
slug target-excluded-fovea-in-99pct-saccadesrole methodologicalpanel fig1C
-
Decoding accuracy in V1, V2 and V3 dips at parafoveal eccentricities and rises again at the fovea rather than decaying steadily.
slug u-shaped-eccentricity-rejects-spilloverrole controlpanel fig2B
-
In foveal V1 under feedback, decoding across semantic category falls while decoding across shape stays high.
slug v1-category-decoding-drops-in-feedbackrole empiricalpanel fig3B
-
Foveal V2 and V3 show the same shape-sensitive, category-insensitive feedback as V1.
slug v2-v3-generalize-shape-not-categoryrole empiricalpanel fig3-figure-supplement-1
| # | slug | role | panel | plain |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cross-decoding-experimental-to-control | empirical | fig2B | A classifier trained on foveal V1 during feedback still identifies the same images when they are shown directly at the fovea. |
| 2 | decoding-shape-sensitive-not-semantic | synthesis | fig3 | Feedback into foveal V1 carries the shape of the saccade target but not its semantic category. |
| 3 | fef-lo-nonsignificant-after-correction | control | fig4B | Frontal eye fields and lateral occipital cortex trend the expected way but fail correction, leaving IPS as the only region that holds. |
| 4 | foveal-feedback-below-direct-stimulation | empirical | fig2A | The saccade target is decoded far less accurately from foveal feedback than from direct stimulation of the fovea by the same image. |
| 5 | foveal-v1-decodes-peripheral-saccade-target | empirical | fig2A | Which peripheral target a person is about to look at can be decoded from foveal V1, even though the target vanishes before fixation. |
| 6 | hypothesis-feedback-carries-shape-not-category | hypothesis | hypothesis | Foveal feedback to early visual cortex carries the target's shape, not its semantic category. |
| 7 | hypothesis-feedback-not-spillover | hypothesis | hypothesis | Foveal V1's information about peripheral targets is genuine top-down feedback, not leakage from large peripheral receptive fields. |
| 8 | hypothesis-shared-representational-format | hypothesis | hypothesis | Foveal feedback during saccade preparation uses the same population code in V1 as an image shown directly at the fovea. |
| 9 | interprets-williams-2008-peripheral-spillover | literature-context | hypothesis (spillover alternative), fig2B (U-shape test) | Williams and colleagues found that foveal V1 carries information about peripheral stimuli, which others attribute to receptive-field spillover. |
| 10 | ips-candidate-driver-foveal-feedback | synthesis | fig4B | Intraparietal sulcus activity tracks foveal decoding more closely than peripheral decoding, making it a candidate source of the feedback. |
| 11 | ips-foveal-effect-reverses-in-control | control | fig4-figure-supplement-1 | When the image is shown directly at the fovea, intraparietal sulcus activity tracks foveal decoding in the opposite direction. |
| 12 | lo-shows-reversed-specificity | empirical | fig3B | In lateral occipital cortex the pattern reverses: decoding across shape falls while decoding across semantic category holds up. |
| 13 | parametric-effects-not-global-fluctuations | interpretation | fig4s1 | Peripheral decoding was unrelated to activity in all three regions where foveal decoding was related to each, ruling out global fluctuations and signal quality. |
| 14 | parametric-modulation-exploratory-not-preregistered | scope | methods | The analysis linking intraparietal, frontal eye field and lateral occipital activity to foveal decoding was exploratory, not preregistered. |
| 15 | prediction-cross-decoding-generalizes | prediction | hypothesis | A classifier trained on foveal V1 during feedback should still identify the same images shown directly at the fovea. |
| 16 | prediction-lo-inverse-pattern | prediction | hypothesis | Lateral occipital cortex should show the opposite profile to foveal V1, losing shape decoding while keeping category decoding. |
| 17 | prediction-u-shape-eccentricity | prediction | hypothesis | Decoding accuracy across early visual cortex should dip at parafoveal eccentricities and rise again at the fovea, not decay steadily. |
| 18 | prediction-v1-category-drops-shape-preserved | prediction | hypothesis | In foveal V1, decoding across semantic category should fall under feedback while decoding across shape should hold up. |
| 19 | preregistered-design-validates-mvpa | methodological | methods | The decoding pipeline, regions of interest and statistical tests were all specified in advance in a preregistered plan. |
| 20 | preregistration-submitted-after-manuscript | scope | methods | The preregistration reached OSF only after the manuscript was submitted, so its timing rests on website timestamps the authors cite. |
| 21 | target-excluded-fovea-in-99pct-saccades | methodological | fig1C | The gaze-contingent display kept the peripheral target out of the central fovea on all but a fraction of a percent of saccades. |
| 22 | u-shaped-eccentricity-rejects-spillover | control | fig2B | Decoding accuracy in V1, V2 and V3 dips at parafoveal eccentricities and rises again at the fovea rather than decaying steadily. |
| 23 | v1-category-decoding-drops-in-feedback | empirical | fig3B | In foveal V1 under feedback, decoding across semantic category falls while decoding across shape stays high. |
| 24 | v2-v3-generalize-shape-not-category | empirical | fig3-figure-supplement-1 | Foveal V2 and V3 show the same shape-sensitive, category-insensitive feedback as V1. |
How it is defined
A model answers this layer, so the prompt is the layer. It is reproduced below from the committed file, and it is a declared input — editing it makes every run that used it stale.
The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.
The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.
Artifacts
Versions
From the run ledger. There is no changelog beside it to keep in step.
-
v2 · 2026-09-12 · supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.json
re-run after the runner changed; one wording added for the promoted claim
python3 scripts/plain_claims.py kammer-2026-foveal-feedback --answer runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.json
-
v1 · 2026-09-11 · supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.json
first run: one plain sentence per claim, answered by Claude Opus 5 through --dump-prompt and fed back through --answer
python3 scripts/plain_claims.py kammer-2026-foveal-feedback --answer runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.json
This layer across the corpus
Across the corpus
10 stale·a paper links to its own cell, where this layer's output for it is rendered
| Paper | State | Version | Last run | Output | Cell |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A three-dimensional immunofluorescence atlas of the …re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the field | stale | v2 | 2026-09-12 | artiushin-2026-spider-atlas.json | json |
| Distinct representational properties of cues and con…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the field | stale | v2 | 2026-09-12 | bouyeure-2026-fear-rsa.json | json |
| Computational modelling identifies key determinants …re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the field | stale | v2 | 2026-09-12 | ejdrup-2026-dopamine.json | json |
| Contributions of insula and superior temporal sulcus…re-run after the runner changed | stale | v6 | 2026-09-12 | gadeke-2026-guilt-insula.json | json |
| Spatially targeted inhibitory rhythms differentially…re-run after the runner changed | stale | v3 | 2026-09-12 | headley-2026-inhibitory-rhythms.json | json |
| Feedback of peripheral saccade targets to early fove…re-run after the runner changed; one wording added for the promoted claim | stale | v2 | 2026-09-12 | kammer-2026-foveal-feedback.json | json |
| iGABASnFR2 is an improved genetically encoded protei…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the field | stale | v3 | 2026-09-12 | kolb-2026-igabasnfr2.json | json |
| A deep learning pipeline for mapping in situ network…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the field | stale | v2 | 2026-09-12 | rozak-2026-neurovascular-dl.json | json |
| Self-association enhances early attentional selectio…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the field | stale | v2 | 2026-09-12 | scheller-2026-self-prioritization.json | json |
| Impaired excitability of fast-spiking neurons in a n…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the field | stale | v2 | 2026-09-12 | wengert-2026-kcnc1.json | json |
Inputs and outputs
- Reads, besides its dependencies
-
- scripts/plain_claims.py · declared, and not in the repository — it hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale
- extract/prompts/plain-claim.md · declared, and not in the repository — it hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale
- Produces
-
- site/src/data/plain-claims/{paper}.json
One per paper — the table above links each one that exists.
- Views
-
- list — rendered above, over the 17 claims in the artifact
- table — rendered above, over the 17 claims in the artifact
Running it
The command comes from the declaration, so this text and what actually runs cannot
diverge. pipeline.py run also runs the unmet dependencies first.
python3 scripts/pipeline.py run <paper> plain-claim
Underneath, that runs python3 scripts/plain_claims.py {paper} --answer runs/{paper}/plain-claim.answer.json.