Plain wording

stale · v2 provisional awaiting approval

What does each claim say, in one sentence a non-specialist can read?

for Feedback of peripheral saccade targets to early foveal cortex · this layer across all papers · json

Provisional

This layer needs a corpus-scope decision that has not been ruled on yet, so what it produces would change if the decision changed. It waits on claim-format, relation-vocab.

Awaiting approval

Waiting for approval. That is a statement about the record, not about whether anyone has read this: people read the corpus without stamping what they read, and only a stamp leaves a trace. Approval is an operation on a version, not a step of its own — it is recorded against the version it was granted to, so running this layer again does not carry it forward.

What it produced24 claims

Read from site/src/data/plain-claims/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback.json · 6 KB. model supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.jsonprompt extract/prompts/plain-claim.md

  1. A classifier trained on foveal V1 during feedback still identifies the same images when they are shown directly at the fovea.

    slug cross-decoding-experimental-to-controlrole empiricalpanel fig2B

  2. Feedback into foveal V1 carries the shape of the saccade target but not its semantic category.

    slug decoding-shape-sensitive-not-semanticrole synthesispanel fig3

  3. Frontal eye fields and lateral occipital cortex trend the expected way but fail correction, leaving IPS as the only region that holds.

    slug fef-lo-nonsignificant-after-correctionrole controlpanel fig4B

  4. The saccade target is decoded far less accurately from foveal feedback than from direct stimulation of the fovea by the same image.

    slug foveal-feedback-below-direct-stimulationrole empiricalpanel fig2A

  5. Which peripheral target a person is about to look at can be decoded from foveal V1, even though the target vanishes before fixation.

    slug foveal-v1-decodes-peripheral-saccade-targetrole empiricalpanel fig2A

  6. Foveal feedback to early visual cortex carries the target's shape, not its semantic category.

    slug hypothesis-feedback-carries-shape-not-categoryrole hypothesispanel hypothesis

  7. Foveal V1's information about peripheral targets is genuine top-down feedback, not leakage from large peripheral receptive fields.

    slug hypothesis-feedback-not-spilloverrole hypothesispanel hypothesis

  8. Foveal feedback during saccade preparation uses the same population code in V1 as an image shown directly at the fovea.

    slug hypothesis-shared-representational-formatrole hypothesispanel hypothesis

  9. Williams and colleagues found that foveal V1 carries information about peripheral stimuli, which others attribute to receptive-field spillover.

    slug interprets-williams-2008-peripheral-spilloverrole literature-contextpanel hypothesis (spillover alternative), fig2B (U-shape test)

  10. Intraparietal sulcus activity tracks foveal decoding more closely than peripheral decoding, making it a candidate source of the feedback.

    slug ips-candidate-driver-foveal-feedbackrole synthesispanel fig4B

  11. When the image is shown directly at the fovea, intraparietal sulcus activity tracks foveal decoding in the opposite direction.

    slug ips-foveal-effect-reverses-in-controlrole controlpanel fig4-figure-supplement-1

  12. In lateral occipital cortex the pattern reverses: decoding across shape falls while decoding across semantic category holds up.

    slug lo-shows-reversed-specificityrole empiricalpanel fig3B

  13. Peripheral decoding was unrelated to activity in all three regions where foveal decoding was related to each, ruling out global fluctuations and signal quality.

    slug parametric-effects-not-global-fluctuationsrole interpretationpanel fig4s1

  14. The analysis linking intraparietal, frontal eye field and lateral occipital activity to foveal decoding was exploratory, not preregistered.

    slug parametric-modulation-exploratory-not-preregisteredrole scopepanel methods

  15. A classifier trained on foveal V1 during feedback should still identify the same images shown directly at the fovea.

    slug prediction-cross-decoding-generalizesrole predictionpanel hypothesis

  16. Lateral occipital cortex should show the opposite profile to foveal V1, losing shape decoding while keeping category decoding.

    slug prediction-lo-inverse-patternrole predictionpanel hypothesis

  17. Decoding accuracy across early visual cortex should dip at parafoveal eccentricities and rise again at the fovea, not decay steadily.

    slug prediction-u-shape-eccentricityrole predictionpanel hypothesis

  18. In foveal V1, decoding across semantic category should fall under feedback while decoding across shape should hold up.

    slug prediction-v1-category-drops-shape-preservedrole predictionpanel hypothesis

  19. The decoding pipeline, regions of interest and statistical tests were all specified in advance in a preregistered plan.

    slug preregistered-design-validates-mvparole methodologicalpanel methods

  20. The preregistration reached OSF only after the manuscript was submitted, so its timing rests on website timestamps the authors cite.

    slug preregistration-submitted-after-manuscriptrole scopepanel methods

  21. The gaze-contingent display kept the peripheral target out of the central fovea on all but a fraction of a percent of saccades.

    slug target-excluded-fovea-in-99pct-saccadesrole methodologicalpanel fig1C

  22. Decoding accuracy in V1, V2 and V3 dips at parafoveal eccentricities and rises again at the fovea rather than decaying steadily.

    slug u-shaped-eccentricity-rejects-spilloverrole controlpanel fig2B

  23. In foveal V1 under feedback, decoding across semantic category falls while decoding across shape stays high.

    slug v1-category-decoding-drops-in-feedbackrole empiricalpanel fig3B

  24. Foveal V2 and V3 show the same shape-sensitive, category-insensitive feedback as V1.

    slug v2-v3-generalize-shape-not-categoryrole empiricalpanel fig3-figure-supplement-1

How it is defined

A model answers this layer, so the prompt is the layer. It is reproduced below from the committed file, and it is a declared input — editing it makes every run that used it stale.

scripts/plain_claims.pythe script that runs itnot in the repository

The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.

extract/prompts/plain-claim.mdthe prompt it runs undernot in the repository

The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.

Artifacts

Versions

From the run ledger. There is no changelog beside it to keep in step.

  1. v2 · 2026-09-12 · supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.json

    re-run after the runner changed; one wording added for the promoted claim

    python3 scripts/plain_claims.py kammer-2026-foveal-feedback --answer runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.json

  2. v1 · 2026-09-11 · supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.json

    first run: one plain sentence per claim, answered by Claude Opus 5 through --dump-prompt and fed back through --answer

    python3 scripts/plain_claims.py kammer-2026-foveal-feedback --answer runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/plain-claim.answer.json

This layer across the corpus

Across the corpus

10 stale·a paper links to its own cell, where this layer's output for it is rendered

PaperStateVersionLast runOutputCell
A three-dimensional immunofluorescence atlas of the …re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the fieldstalev22026-09-12artiushin-2026-spider-atlas.jsonjson
Distinct representational properties of cues and con…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the fieldstalev22026-09-12bouyeure-2026-fear-rsa.jsonjson
Computational modelling identifies key determinants …re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the fieldstalev22026-09-12ejdrup-2026-dopamine.jsonjson
Contributions of insula and superior temporal sulcus…re-run after the runner changedstalev62026-09-12gadeke-2026-guilt-insula.jsonjson
Spatially targeted inhibitory rhythms differentially…re-run after the runner changedstalev32026-09-12headley-2026-inhibitory-rhythms.jsonjson
Feedback of peripheral saccade targets to early fove…re-run after the runner changed; one wording added for the promoted claimstalev22026-09-12kammer-2026-foveal-feedback.jsonjson
iGABASnFR2 is an improved genetically encoded protei…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the fieldstalev32026-09-12kolb-2026-igabasnfr2.jsonjson
A deep learning pipeline for mapping in situ network…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the fieldstalev22026-09-12rozak-2026-neurovascular-dl.jsonjson
Self-association enhances early attentional selectio…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the fieldstalev22026-09-12scheller-2026-self-prioritization.jsonjson
Impaired excitability of fast-spiking neurons in a n…re-run after the runner changed; no cost recorded — these answers predate the fieldstalev22026-09-12wengert-2026-kcnc1.jsonjson

Inputs and outputs

Reads, besides its dependencies
Produces
  • site/src/data/plain-claims/{paper}.json

One per paper — the table above links each one that exists.

Views
  • list — rendered above, over the 17 claims in the artifact
  • table — rendered above, over the 17 claims in the artifact

Running it

The command comes from the declaration, so this text and what actually runs cannot diverge. pipeline.py run also runs the unmet dependencies first.

python3 scripts/pipeline.py run <paper> plain-claim

Underneath, that runs python3 scripts/plain_claims.py {paper} --answer runs/{paper}/plain-claim.answer.json.