Coverage adjudication
stale · v2 provisional awaiting approvalOf the spans the matcher could not resolve, which are real gaps?
for Feedback of peripheral saccade targets to early foveal cortex · this layer across all papers · json
Provisional
This layer needs a corpus-scope decision that has not been ruled on yet, so what it produces would change if the decision changed. It waits on claim-format, relation-vocab.
Awaiting approval
Waiting for approval. That is a statement about the record, not about whether anyone has read this: people read the corpus without stamping what they read, and only a stamp leaves a trace. Approval is an operation on a version, not a step of its own — it is recorded against the version it was granted to, so running this layer again does not carry it forward.
Out of date
These inputs changed after this ran:
- coverage/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback.json
What it produced21 spans
Read from mappings/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback.json · 5 KB. adjudicated 2026-09-11by supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/adjudication.answer.json
| # | uid | verdict | claim | why | sha | claim_sha | tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | results-003 | not-an-assertion | — | Design narration: it says why a block design was chosen and reports no result of its own. | 000804db | — | — |
| 2 | results-013 | not-an-assertion | — | A bare panel label telling the reader what the illustration depicts, not a finding. | fa264e27 | — | — |
| 3 | results-017 | covered | foveal-v1-decodes-peripheral-saccade-target | The claim already specifies the four saccade targets as varying in shape and semantic category, which is exactly the stimulus set this panel depicts. | 40f7e118 | f6f5df80 | — |
| 4 | results-021 | not-an-assertion | — | Narration of how the control condition was run; it states no outcome of its own. | e270d3ab | — | — |
| 5 | results-023 | not-an-assertion | — | Narration of why four natural stimuli were used, asserting nothing about what was found. | 9d0ac6e9 | — | — |
| 6 | results-044 | covered | decoding-shape-sensitive-not-semantic | The section heading states the shape-sensitive, category-insensitive result that this claim makes. | a2ece563 | 72a4f6df | — |
| 7 | results-048 | not-an-assertion | — | A schematic panel label explaining which comparisons are drawn, not a result. | ed2ba163 | — | — |
| 8 | results-055 | not-an-assertion | — | A bare supplementary-figure title with no finding attached. | b074ff40 | — | — |
| 9 | results-070 | not-an-assertion | — | Narration of ROI selection with supporting citations; the analysis result comes in the sentences that follow. | 6388dea3 | — | — |
| 10 | results-077 | gap | — | No claim carries this null: the tree states the IPS foveal effect and the FEF/LO non-significance, but never that peripheral decoding was unrelated to activity in any ROI. | 5c4df3c3 | — | f5b9ef57 |
| 11 | results-078 | gap | — | The tree has no claim ruling out global brain fluctuations or signal-to-noise as explanations of the parametric modulation effects. | 424097a9 | — | f5b9ef57 |
| 12 | results-080 | not-an-assertion | — | A bare panel label naming the cortical masks shown. | e75150e3 | — | — |
| 13 | results-084 | not-an-assertion | — | A bare supplementary-figure title with no finding attached. | ac30bd88 | — | — |
| 14 | results-085 | not-an-assertion | — | Analysis narration stating which analysis was repeated, with no result. | 47105b02 | — | — |
| 15 | results-088 | gap | — | The control-condition null for peripheral decoding across FEF, IPS and LO is reported nowhere in the claim tree. | dc5e84b3 | — | f5b9ef57 |
| 16 | captions-020 | not-an-assertion | — | A panel label naming the quantity plotted and the sample size, without stating any outcome. | ffbe1de5 | — | — |
| 17 | captions-023 | not-an-assertion | — | A bare supplementary-figure title with no finding attached. | 5aadb48b | — | — |
| 18 | captions-029 | not-an-assertion | — | A panel label naming which analysis is displayed, without stating its outcome. | aabc87eb | — | — |
| 19 | captions-031 | not-an-assertion | — | A bare supplementary-figure title with no finding attached. | 98635326 | — | — |
| 20 | captions-032 | not-an-assertion | — | Analysis narration stating which analysis was repeated, with no result. | 47105b02 | — | — |
| 21 | captions-035 | gap | — | This caption is one of the only places the control-condition peripheral-decoding null across all three ROIs is reported, and no claim states it. | dc5e84b3 | — | f5b9ef57 |
How it is defined
A model answers this layer, so the prompt is the layer. It is reproduced below from the committed file, and it is a declared input — editing it makes every run that used it stale.
The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.
The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.
Artifacts
Versions
From the run ledger. There is no changelog beside it to keep in step.
-
v2 · 2026-09-11 · supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/adjudication.answer.json
re-validated against the current tree; verdicts now carry the tree fingerprint
python3 scripts/adjudicate.py kammer-2026-foveal-feedback --answer runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/adjudication.answer.json
-
v1 · 2026-09-11 · supplied:runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/adjudication.answer.json
verdicts answered by Claude Opus 5 through --dump-prompt
python3 scripts/adjudicate.py kammer-2026-foveal-feedback --answer runs/kammer-2026-foveal-feedback/adjudication.answer.json
This layer across the corpus
Across the corpus
10 stale·a paper links to its own cell, where this layer's output for it is rendered
Inputs and outputs
- Reads, besides its dependencies
-
- extract/prompts/coverage-adjudicator.md · declared, and not in the repository — it hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale
- scripts/adjudicate.py · declared, and not in the repository — it hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale
- Produces
-
- mappings/{paper}.json
One per paper — the table above links each one that exists.
- Views
-
- table — rendered above, over the 121 spans in the artifact
Running it
The command comes from the declaration, so this text and what actually runs cannot
diverge. pipeline.py run also runs the unmet dependencies first.
python3 scripts/pipeline.py run <paper> adjudication
Underneath, that runs python3 scripts/adjudicate.py {paper} --answer runs/{paper}/adjudication.answer.json.