Coverage adjudication
stale · v3 provisional awaiting approvalOf the spans the matcher could not resolve, which are real gaps?
for iGABASnFR2 is an improved genetically encoded protein sensor of GABA · this layer across all papers · json
Provisional
This layer needs a corpus-scope decision that has not been ruled on yet, so what it produces would change if the decision changed. It waits on claim-format, relation-vocab.
Awaiting approval
Waiting for approval. That is a statement about the record, not about whether anyone has read this: people read the corpus without stamping what they read, and only a stamp leaves a trace. Approval is an operation on a version, not a step of its own — it is recorded against the version it was granted to, so running this layer again does not carry it forward.
What it produced41 spans
Read from mappings/kolb-2026-igabasnfr2.json · 11 KB. adjudicated 2026-09-11by supplied:runs/kolb-2026-igabasnfr2/adjudication.answer.json
| # | uid | verdict | claim | why | sha | tree | claim_sha |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | results-001 | gap | — | The tree never states what iGABASnFR1 was engineered to do or how it performed, so this baseline characterisation of the predecessor sensor rests on no claim. | 59e1142c | b6bc662a | — |
| 2 | results-009 | not-an-assertion | — | A note on residue-numbering convention pointing to a supplementary sequence figure, asserting nothing about the sensor. | f4fd8433 | — | — |
| 3 | results-023 | not-an-assertion | — | A bare figure title for the annotated sequence supplement, carrying no finding of its own. | 69066e07 | — | — |
| 4 | results-037 | covered | mutagenesis-3947-variants-screened | The claim that 3,947 variants were generated from 39 targeted sites accounts for this breakdown of where those 39 sites lie. | 162ae33f | — | cf00e2ea |
| 5 | results-059 | covered | igabasnfr2-fourfold-sensitivity-gain | This is the 4.1-fold peak dF/F improvement the claim asserts, reported here with its statistics and the accompanying SNR gain. | 22d0fe78 | — | 9b8a5958 |
| 6 | results-060 | covered | igabasnfr2-kinetics-rise-decay | The claim states exactly this pairing of a faster rise and a slower decay for iGABASnFR2 relative to iGABASnFR1. | 1f1b8c65 | — | 70dcfeab |
| 7 | results-061 | gap | — | The tree's only claim about iGABASnFR2n covers its screening dF/F and responsive-pixel count, not its evoked-release performance in neurons (3.3-fold peak dF/F, 40% higher SNR). | af31b87f | b6bc662a | — |
| 8 | results-066 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the traces and error bars represent. | 077e6533 | — | — |
| 9 | results-067 | gap | — | The kinetics claim covers rise and decay at 10 action potentials; the single-AP rise-time comparison shown in this panel is stated nowhere in the tree. | bd80028a | b6bc662a | — |
| 10 | results-084 | gap | — | No claim states that the F101L hinge mutation of iGABASnFR1 raised binding affinity tenfold. | 2eb9bf42 | b6bc662a | — |
| 11 | results-086 | gap | — | The structural claims cover the deposition and the rigidity of cpGFP on binding, but not the identity of the residues that form the GABA binding site. | 5f43fa32 | b6bc662a | — |
| 12 | results-091 | gap | — | The proposed hydrogen-bonding role of the L178gfpS mutation in enhancing the fluorescence change is a mechanistic interpretation no claim carries. | 2aded4dc | b6bc662a | — |
| 13 | results-103 | gap | — | The affinity claim is about on-cell EC50; the purified-protein result that iGABASnFR2 has a smaller dynamic range than iGABASnFR1 despite higher solution affinity appears in no claim. | f144e398 | b6bc662a | — |
| 14 | results-113 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the fitted lines and error bars represent. | 22ac2311 | — | — |
| 15 | results-122 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the fitted lines represent and how many replicates they average. | 4345706b | — | — |
| 16 | results-128 | not-an-assertion | — | A statement of replicate count for the titrations, not a result. | 3167018a | — | — |
| 17 | results-130 | covered | igabasnfr2-gaba-selective-specificity | This describes the competition titrations against related compounds at 1 mM that the selectivity claim reports as showing no interference. | 8990929a | — | 2233bfaa |
| 18 | results-136 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the plotted points and error bars represent. | 30fc6a04 | — | — |
| 19 | results-144 | not-an-assertion | — | A pure cross-reference to Table 1. | c1690d0d | — | — |
| 20 | results-147 | gap | — | This table is the only place the purified-protein photophysics appear - extinction coefficients (iGABASnFR2 roughly double iGABASnFR1's), quantum yields, fluorescence lifetimes and peak wavelengths - … | e04c6071 | b6bc662a | — |
| 21 | results-152 | gap | — | The retina claim asserts that direction-selective GABA release was demonstrated, but no claim states the centrifugal-versus-centripetal hypothesis being tested. | 182a4bb1 | b6bc662a | — |
| 22 | results-153 | gap | — | The relay of direction-selective inhibition to DSGCs through asymmetric connections is background from prior work that no claim in the tree carries. | 2f353163 | b6bc662a | — |
| 23 | results-160 | covered | igabasnfr2-retina-direction-selectivity | The claim's comparison of response reliability between the two sensors accounts for these amplitude and reliability distributions from iGABASnFR-expressing SACs. | c0e1f4d8 | — | 3aa1c28a |
| 24 | results-161 | covered | igabasnfr2-retina-direction-selectivity | The matching iGABASnFR2 distributions are the other half of the sensor comparison the claim makes. | 18831152 | — | 3aa1c28a |
| 25 | results-164 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the line and shading represent. | 39e35e3c | — | — |
| 26 | results-165 | covered | igabasnfr2-retina-direction-selectivity | The claim asserts significantly higher SNR for iGABASnFR2 in retina, which is what this comparison tests. | f62aa92f | — | 3aa1c28a |
| 27 | results-166 | covered | igabasnfr2-retina-direction-selectivity | The claim that iGABASnFR2 resolves direction selectivity where iGABASnFR1 cannot accounts for this circular-variance comparison. | 0d12f294 | — | 3aa1c28a |
| 28 | captions-004 | not-an-assertion | — | A note on residue-numbering convention pointing to a supplementary sequence figure, asserting nothing about the sensor. | f4fd8433 | — | — |
| 29 | captions-018 | not-an-assertion | — | A bare figure title for the annotated sequence supplement, carrying no finding of its own. | 1e7abca1 | — | — |
| 30 | captions-029 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the traces and error bars represent. | 077e6533 | — | — |
| 31 | captions-030 | gap | — | The kinetics claim covers rise and decay at 10 action potentials; the single-AP rise-time comparison shown in this panel is stated nowhere in the tree. | bd80028a | b6bc662a | — |
| 32 | captions-044 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the fitted lines and error bars represent. | 22ac2311 | — | — |
| 33 | captions-053 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the fitted lines represent and how many replicates they average. | 4345706b | — | — |
| 34 | captions-060 | covered | igabasnfr2-gaba-selective-specificity | This describes the competition titrations against related compounds at 1 mM that the selectivity claim reports as showing no interference. | 8990929a | — | 2233bfaa |
| 35 | captions-065 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the plotted points and error bars represent. | 30fc6a04 | — | — |
| 36 | captions-072 | covered | igabasnfr2-retina-direction-selectivity | The claim's comparison of response reliability between the two sensors accounts for these amplitude and reliability distributions from iGABASnFR-expressing SACs. | c0e1f4d8 | — | 3aa1c28a |
| 37 | captions-073 | covered | igabasnfr2-retina-direction-selectivity | The matching iGABASnFR2 distributions are the other half of the sensor comparison the claim makes. | 18831152 | — | 3aa1c28a |
| 38 | captions-076 | not-an-assertion | — | A graphical-encoding note on what the line and shading represent. | 39e35e3c | — | — |
| 39 | captions-077 | covered | igabasnfr2-retina-direction-selectivity | The claim asserts significantly higher SNR for iGABASnFR2 in retina, which is what this comparison tests. | f62aa92f | — | 3aa1c28a |
| 40 | captions-078 | covered | igabasnfr2-retina-direction-selectivity | The claim that iGABASnFR2 resolves direction selectivity where iGABASnFR1 cannot accounts for this circular-variance comparison. | 0d12f294 | — | 3aa1c28a |
| 41 | tables-001 | gap | — | This table is the only place the purified-protein photophysics appear - extinction coefficients (iGABASnFR2 roughly double iGABASnFR1's), quantum yields, fluorescence lifetimes and peak wavelengths - … | 70881f81 | b6bc662a | — |
How it is defined
A model answers this layer, so the prompt is the layer. It is reproduced below from the committed file, and it is a declared input — editing it makes every run that used it stale.
The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.
The declaration names this path and the repository does not have it. An input that does not exist hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale — the layer is declared to depend on something it is not in fact tracking.
Artifacts
Versions
From the run ledger. There is no changelog beside it to keep in step.
-
v3 · 2026-09-13 · supplied:runs/kolb-2026-igabasnfr2/adjudication.answer.json
ran via scripts/pipeline.py
python3 scripts/adjudicate.py kolb-2026-igabasnfr2 --answer runs/kolb-2026-igabasnfr2/adjudication.answer.json
-
v2 · 2026-09-11 · supplied:runs/kolb-2026-igabasnfr2/adjudication.answer.json
re-validated against the current tree; verdicts now carry the tree fingerprint
python3 scripts/adjudicate.py kolb-2026-igabasnfr2 --answer runs/kolb-2026-igabasnfr2/adjudication.answer.json
-
v1 · 2026-09-11 · supplied:runs/kolb-2026-igabasnfr2/adjudication.answer.json
verdicts answered by Claude Opus 5 through --dump-prompt
python3 scripts/adjudicate.py kolb-2026-igabasnfr2 --answer runs/kolb-2026-igabasnfr2/adjudication.answer.json
This layer across the corpus
Across the corpus
10 stale·a paper links to its own cell, where this layer's output for it is rendered
Inputs and outputs
- Reads, besides its dependencies
-
- extract/prompts/coverage-adjudicator.md · declared, and not in the repository — it hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale
- scripts/adjudicate.py · declared, and not in the repository — it hashes to nothing, so it cannot make a run stale
- Produces
-
- mappings/{paper}.json
One per paper — the table above links each one that exists.
- Views
-
- table — rendered above, over the 121 spans in the artifact
Running it
The command comes from the declaration, so this text and what actually runs cannot
diverge. pipeline.py run also runs the unmet dependencies first.
python3 scripts/pipeline.py run <paper> adjudication
Underneath, that runs python3 scripts/adjudicate.py {paper} --answer runs/{paper}/adjudication.answer.json.